A Georgia judge recently expressed skepticism towards a rule requiring all absentee ballots in the state to be hand-counted, suggesting it could lead to chaos. The rule, which was passed by the Georgia State Election Board, has faced backlash from election officials who argue that it could delay the certification of election results.
During a hearing, Judge Brian Amero raised concerns about the practicality of hand-counting millions of ballots and questioned whether it would be feasible to complete the process within the tight timeframe for certifying election results. The judge also noted that the rule has caused confusion among election workers and could potentially lead to inaccuracies in the counting process.
The hand-counting rule was implemented following allegations of irregularities in the 2020 election, but critics argue that it is unnecessary and could undermine the integrity of the election process. Supporters of the rule, however, believe that it will help ensure the accuracy of the election results and restore trust in the electoral system.
The judge’s skepticism towards the hand-counting rule highlights the ongoing debate over election integrity and the challenges that states face in navigating the complexities of the electoral process. As Georgia continues to grapple with these issues, it remains to be seen how the hand-counting rule will impact the state’s upcoming elections and whether it will ultimately be upheld in court.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com