Microsoft Responds to Controversy Over AI Technology Supplied to Israel
Microsoft has confirmed its provision of AI technology to the Israel Ministry of Defense (IMOD) but insists there is "no evidence" that its technology has targeted civilians in the ongoing conflict in Gaza. In a recent statement, the tech giant acknowledged supplying IMOD with a range of services, including Azure cloud and AI capabilities, as part of standard cybersecurity efforts to protect against external threats.
The confirmation comes in the wake of allegations that the Israeli military has employed AI, particularly a system called Lavender, which reportedly contributed to civilian casualties. Amidst growing concerns from employees and the public regarding Microsoft’s involvement, the company conducted an internal review, collaborating with an unnamed external firm. They found no evidence linking their technology to harm in the conflict.
Microsoft emphasized that its partnership with IMOD is structured like any other commercial relationship, governed by strict terms of service and an Acceptable Use Policy. However, the company also admitted to providing limited emergency assistance to Israel following the October 7 incident, aimed at hostage rescue efforts under tight oversight.
While Microsoft maintains it has not developed proprietary military applications for IMOD, it acknowledged challenges in monitoring customer use of its technology in private government cloud operations. This situation has led to public backlash, including the "No Azure for Apartheid" petition with over 1,500 signatures from current and former employees seeking transparency in Microsoft’s dealings.
The international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement has also called for a boycott of Microsoft products as a reaction to its involvement with the Israeli military, and some developers have removed their games from Xbox in solidarity. Critics, including former employee Hossam Nasr, argue that Microsoft’s statement aims to mitigate reputational damage rather than address the underlying employee concerns.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
