Georgia’s election chief, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, has criticized a federal judge’s ruling that mandates a hand count of ballots in the state. The ruling comes in response to a lawsuit filed by voting integrity activists who argue that Georgia’s new voting system is vulnerable to hacking and tampering.
Raffensperger expressed his frustration with the ruling, stating that it will delay the certification of election results and undermine public confidence in the electoral process. He emphasized that Georgia’s election system is secure and that there is no evidence of widespread fraud or irregularities in the state’s recent elections.
The decision to conduct a hand count of ballots has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the integrity of Georgia’s election process. Critics of the ruling argue that it will invite legal challenges and further politicize the election results.
The hand count of ballots is expected to take several days and will involve a large team of election workers carefully examining each ballot to ensure accuracy. The results of the hand count will then be compared to the electronic tallies to verify the accuracy of the vote.
Despite criticism from Raffensperger and others, the federal judge’s ruling stands, and Georgia election officials are now tasked with carrying out the hand count of ballots. The outcome of this process will be closely watched by both sides of the political divide as they await the final results of Georgia’s elections.
Overall, the decision to conduct a hand count of ballots in Georgia has raised questions about the security and credibility of the state’s election process. It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact future elections in Georgia and the confidence of voters in the integrity of the electoral system.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com
